On Wednesday 23 June 2004 11:19, Patrick Useldinger wrote:
Patrick Kaell wrote:
What about Solaris x86? Sun and AT&T (the
creator of UNIX)
cooperated in the early 90's. As a result, Solaris is THE Unix
implemention for those who want to learn a real Unix. Solaris 8 is
free (but only as in beer, not speech). But recently Sun has had
the intention to open source it.
Let's face it - i am a *user*, not a geek. My intention is to have a
working computer that allows me to do the basic operations: word
processing, spreadsheets, Internet browsing and emails. I am not
looking for the purest or technically best implementation of an OS,
just something that is stable, fun to use, and as free (beer) as
possible.
I am, today, a Windows user, so I have a working PC which allows me
to do what I want. I am tempted by Unix and FreeBSD came pretty close
to convincing me.
But the two things where FreeBSD failed, and that's purely a matter
of personal preference, is:
-1- lack of binary distributions
I am still looking for a good reason to compile everything from
source. Maybe there is one. Until I find it, a binary distribution
has the following advantages:
- saves you plenty of time
- gives you a guarantee that the binary actually work, which may not
be the case if you compile it yourself.
there is binary package avaliaible for *BSD. Just use pkg_add command.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.ht…
-2- lack of commercial support
I like the idea of Debian, but I wouldn't get religious about it. An
OS should be free, but I am willing to pay for programs if they suit
my needs and if the price is fair (unlike MsOffice, for example).
Linux has been adopted by companies, so the chances to find
commercial software are far better that with FreeBSD.
there is also a emulation layer, for binary compatibility.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu.html
and there is commercial support, :
http://www.freebsd.org/commercial/consulting.html
--
Mickaël Scherer