-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
excuse me?
i _fully_ disagree with your opinion.
a distro is _VERY_ important.
not every distro is the same, not every distro feels the same or has the same
"features".
i've been using over the years, all sorts of distros, and the one and only i
really feel comfortable with right now, is gentoo.
why? because it's source based, because it has IMO, the best package manager
and system of them all, because _"I"_ have the freedom to do whatever i want,
to tweak whatever i want without making my system comlain about everything or
making it unstable, because there's no need for "upgrading" to a new
version
every x-months, because there are updates availble, and those you are looking
for, and for many other reasons....
i do think, that it's important what distro you use, and that you think well
before choosing.
and, that not every distro is suitable for every user.
but that's just my opinion...
On Monday 28 June 2004 15:05, Patrick Kaell wrote:
The distro is not as important as we all think. Much
more important are
the applications and the whole environment. For example, I recreate on
every Un*x platform I work my favorite environment (shell profile, shell
aliases, window manager settings, etc). I even compile the GNU ls
(because of the colours) on every *BSD and commercial Unix I use.
In fact I use Yellow Dog Linux and MacOS X (also a real Unix) as a dual
boot solution on my iBook (Slackware is x86 only), Solaris 8 on my
SparcStation 5 and use RedHat and AIX at work. And guess what? They all
look and *feel* the same. I have installed the same tools, window
manager, applications, have the same settings and so on. I don't use the
distro's defaults.
My opinion: It may be difficult to find your optimal distro, but finding
your optimal editor or script language is far more important. As long as
you are *using* your computer instead of tweaking, upgrading and
installing all the time, the distro is not important at all.
You have extremely many choices: the base OS (*BSD, Linux), the distro,
the shell (bash, tcsh, ksh, zsh, ...), the editor (vi, emacs), the vi
derivative (nvi, vim, elvis, ...), the emacs implementation (GNU Emacs,
uemacs, xemacs, jed, ...), the graphical editor (nedit, scite, gedit,
bluefish, xvi, ...), the windowmanager (twm, fvwm, olvwm, icewm,
windowmaker, afterstep, ion, wm2, blackbox, fluxbox, openbox, ...), the
desktop environment (CDE, KDE, Gnome, xfce, ...) and so on.
For instance, here is a good page comparing the window managers:
http://xwinman.org
Simply take the first distro you can get. Even if it is not the optimal
one it will not be bad. You have to use Linux, read articles, try out
many things before you find your optimal environment.
By the way, here are my favorites:
Shell: bash, (also like tcsh)
Window Manager: icewm, (also like window maker)
File Manager (&Desktop): ROX
http://rox.sourceforge.net , very speedy!
Programming Language: C
Script Language: bash, gawk
Graphical Tools: xv, xpaint, bitmap, gimp
Vector Graphical Tool: xfig
Text Processing: LaTeX (yes, still better than all the WYSIWYG)
Text Editor: nedit, (also like scite)
vi derivative: elvis
WWW Browser: mozilla, dillo (very speedy!!!)
Mail Client: mozilla
Small Database: grok
Calendar: plan
Patrick Kaell
_______________________________________________
Lilux-help mailing list
Lilux-help(a)lilux.lu
http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-help -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA4CQF8pWPvwUjUA0RAqjDAJ4xFpCWnGHUUe5WfMlzZvJaPZYj8ACg0Rlh
21GuRU8+OyUloc1a5UsYYdI=
=FnjW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----