Hi,
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Patrick Kaell wrote:
[MacOS X & simple install, password protection]
Ouch, if that was too much...
Remember: We are not simple users, we don't know
how a user thinks!
Well, there is a field named "usability". I'm no expert at
all in this field, but I can assure you that people developing
GNOME, KDE etc. have at a minimum read over some texts on this.
Having priviledge separation means more security. But
it may touble users.
Should we now really bash Lindows/Linspire because everythings runs
under 'root'????
Actually, yes.
I think the main problem is marketing. A computer is a complex
machine, much more so than most others normal people deal with.
I don't think it really has to dumb down to the level of such
users as you're talking about.
It is absolutely normal that people have to learn how to use
some machine - why shouldn't they learn a minimum about the
computer they use?
When there's work to do on the car, I can either do it myself
(for simple stuff I'll do it), or ask someone who knows about
it (i.e. I go to the garage).
Same can apply to the computer. And many users will actually
go to a PC shop to get some servicing done.
If marketing suggests that a computer is simple to use for
anybody to do anything, they're lying, they're raising the
expectations a bit too high.
The solution is not to make the machine dangerously "dumb"
(and no, I don't mean to say that things can't be simplyfied),
the solution is to better educate the users.
Noone will expect anyone to drive a car without having been
schooled in driving and having passed a test. IMHO a PC is
more difficult to use than a car. Maybe you can't (easily)
kill anyone using a computer, but still, I think it's not
too much to ask that people should learn how to use such a
tool correctly.
As long as people make this kind of mistakes on some
isolated PC without interaction, it's one thing. As soon
as there is interaction, especially a connection to Internet,
they become a danger to everyone around - this is the very
reason why we have these floods of viruses, worms, trojans
etc. At this point, really, I've got very little symphathy
left for people who don't even want to learn the most basic
notions.
Unix was designed as a multiuser OS, where you had a
clued admin which
did the administration. Windows is a PC OS! This is a basic fact. I
could now continue with drive letters and so on....
I remember reading an article in 1994 about Linux. It said: You can't
expect to install and master Linux in a day like DOS, Windows and OS/2.
That's what I'm saying - there is no "mastering DOS or WINDOWS or
OS/2 in a day", that's a bold-faced lie. I've used all of these,
I've got to know them quite well (part of the reason why I like
Linux so much), and I know for a fact that any of these, even DOS,
are much too complex to "master" in a day.
Would it happen, than it would mean that you mananged
to become a Unix
administrator overnight. This is not possible for most people!
No. And if anyone believes they can become a Windows admin
overnight, I've god really bad news for them. Unfortunately,
too many PHBs have that kind of illusion.
Greets Eric