Hello Kymon,
well, I'm working in a company which uses only printservers for printing
and sometimes you can have very strange problems with them.
First, you can use network lpd printing even from Windows XP. If you want
to know how, you can ask.
Second, as I know, the printserver should always forward every print job
directly to the printer. So you should not be limited to 64k print jobs,
but either to 8 MB print jobs. Because the 64k cache should be only for
caching the stream flow.
Which printer driver do you use on linux? (this could be one reason for
your problems)
Which printer do you have.
Which router (incl. print server) do you have?
Another problem could be also that the print server has bugs and does not
support the LPD protocol correctly, so look out for firmware updates.
Warning: I am not responsible in hardware failures due to firmware
updating, be sure that you know what you do. You could destroy your
router/printserver with an fw update.
Another solution would be to buy a separatly print server for USB or
parallel port (for about 65 euros).
Regards,
Michel Kohl
At 20:01 08.04.2005, Kymon MacDaire wrote:
greetings,
my printer is hooked up to a router/printserver combo that supports LPD,
so i set up linux to use network lpd printing. unfortunately the
printserver is very slow, and seems to be unable to transmit some
documents properly to the printer. the reason seems to be the following,
stated on the manufacturer's webpage: "The Print Server Buffer, is only
64K, so large print jobs are nearly always not executed correctly or at
all.".
>is there any hope for a workaround?
>maybe either by:
>- letting the linux box do the processing before sending the print job to
>the printserver.
>- convincing the printserver to let the printer do the processing, which
>is probably better suited to do the job with 8MB of memory.
>
>best regards,
>
>kymon
>_______________________________________________
>Lilux-help mailing list
>Lilux-help(a)lilux.lu
>http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-help