Hi
Since SuSE 8.2, I have trouble with the IDE drivers. If the kernel tries to
reach the drives, I got a message:
kernel: hdd: packet command error: error =0x51 {Drive Ready SeekComplete
Error)
kernel:hdd: packet command error: error = 0x54
After a few messages, the drive mounts, but there are still new generated
messages.
I use SuSE 9.1, kernel 2.6.5-7.95-default, hdd=HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4081B
But it is not Drive specific. If I mount /dev/hdc, I got the same error
messages for hdc!
That slowss down the system!
Any idea?
Thanx.
Al
Hi,
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Henri Majerus wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 09:45, Alain Knaff wrote:
>
> > All went fine until the very end. After cloning our newly set up
> > client to the 9 others we noticed that we could no longer join the
> > domain:
>
> I presume your problem is only with the windows clones...
>
> In fact windows identifies windows 2000 and XP computers on a domain not
> only by name but also by SID. On cloned computers this is a problem!
Yup, that's plausible.
> I newer checked for a solution since I don't have the need for a domain
> but here one result of a google search:
>
> http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/newsid.shtmls...
There is also some "sysprep" utility to use on the "master"
before cloning an MS Windows machine, which allows to remove
such specifics - no idea though how this gets (re)set after
cloning - I guess it's a case for RTFM'ing ;-)
Greets & hth, Eric
[Sorry to ask a Windows question on the list...]
This weekend we upgraded the Linuxstuff to newer versions of the
Software (new Windows XP on the client, new SuSE 9.1 on client and
server). SuSE 9.1 has samba 3.0 whereas 8.2, that we used before, had
samba 2.0.
All went fine until the very end. After cloning our newly set up
client to the 9 others we noticed that we could no longer join the
domain:
Whenever we tried to join the domain we got the following error:
"Multiple connections to a server or shared resource by the same
user, using more than one user name, are not allowed. Disconnect all
previous connections to the server or shared resource and try again"
However, no shares were mapped when this message was displayed (we
checked by looking at "My Computer" at client, and also by doing a
smbstatus on the server... Or could there be hidden "connections" that
show up at different places?)
Multiple reboots didn't help either. Changing the domain name on the
server didn't help (INTERNETSTUFFEN). First putting the clients into a
workgroup with the same name (INTERNETSTUFFEN) before joining the
domain didn't help either.
We had kept one of the old clients as a "backup" on the XP version
from last summer, and that client could still leave and join the
domain without any problems whatsoever.
Has anybody come accross a similar problem, and found a solution?
Thanks,
Alain
compiling:
does anyone know about a good guide on how to compile from source?
problems i have:
- what programs and libs are considered to be standard, so they are not
mentioned in any install instructions? (default suse doesn't even have
gcc installed)
- how to tell if a problem is a missing package/distribution
specific/broken code/wrong compiler version/ ..., so you know where to
ask for help?
dockapps:
i'm trying fluxbox, and i quite like it because it's easy to configure.
now i would like to start some dockapps when fluxbox starts. i read in
an faq that you need to put them in your .xinitrc, after starting the
windowmanager. i wonder if this applies for suse, as there is a
graphical login, where you can chose your windowmanager. so there would
have to be a different .xinitrc for each windowmanager? i'm clueless...
if someone knows what to do, or where i could read about how suse
handles such things, i'd be grateful.
kymon
I use Openoffice 1.1.1 and have trouble printing to envelopes. (on a psc1210
with hpijs 1.6.1 and hpoj 0.91 on SuSE 9.1)
The printer always forwards the envelope too far, so it cannot print on it.
It's something like the paper size is too big. If I change it to C6 in the
printer settings in OO, the problem is still there.
Is that a bug in OO 1.1.1 or do I make something wrong?
Al
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
alain.lutgen(a)ist.lu wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I decided recently to install ,LINUX Suse 9.1 using Yast2, on my old PC.
| It has only 64MB RAM, a PENTIUM CELERON 33 MHz processor and a 10GB Harddisk.
|
| Is it possible to run this LINUX Version correctly ???
Depends on what you want to do.
I assume the Celeron is at least 133 MHz
Running X-windows with KDE and OpenOffice will be a very bad experience.
128MBytes of RAM would be the minimum. 256Mbytes would be adequate even if still slow
due to the CPU.
You may run something like X with blackbox and applications like Opera or Mozilla and
other smaller X applications.
If you want to use it as a router/gateway/firewall/small web/mail-server the hardware
is fine.
You should subscribe to our mailing list: lilux-help(a)linux.lu
http://www.linux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-help
For the list members: Please include Alain in reply he is not yet on the list.
|
| Nice greetings, ALAIN
|
|
|
|
|
| **********************************************************************
| This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
| intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
| are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
| the system manager.
|
| This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the
presence of computer viruses.
|
| **********************************************************************
- --
Thierry Coutelier Président LiLux asbl
7, Rue Jacques Sturm L-2556 Luxembourg
Office:+352 710725 608 Home:+352 406776
http://www.linux.lu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBLDFrPOfrcNNQX7oRAvCUAKCRzOkUNhqS6ZeVf0ovFETGZFCR0wCdEAiq
7nRpGw30w24EFnvdiICkw2k=
=eMDN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi there,
Using Ximian Evolution 1.4.4, when I write mails (using Ximian) it
usually sends them right away as soon as I hit the "finish/send" button
(I'm using IP-over-cable).
I'd like to keep the messages in the "Outbox" for a few minutes before
they're sent, so I have a chance to change my mind or review the
messages.
Does anyone know if this is possible?
Serge
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Marelli, Luxembourg
E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiLux, Luxembourg LUG : http://www.linux.lu/
Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
Hi everyone,
currently I'm replacing my old 10Base2 ethernet at home
with a 802.11g WLAN. I'm running into some range problems.
The hardware is the following:
Allnet 0271 PCI cards (supported by stock 2.6 kernel, yay)
SMC 2802W.V2 PCI cards (supported by ndiswrapper only, shame)
Linksys WRT54GS Router (nicely hackable)
The trouble is that the PCI cards are unable to connect wirelessly,
even though the distance is less than 10 meters. There are 2 walls
inbetween the PCs. The house was built in 1974, and I'm not sure
if any steel-reinforced concrete has been used.
Some experiments have shown that as long as there is an
approximate line of sight between any of the components,
things will work somewhat, although the range is still bad
( > 50% packet loss at less than 10 meters distance).
Curiously, a Centrino-based laptop (802.11b) gets "great" range
(> 20 meters). I've tried forcing the whole WLAN to 802.11b,
but that doesn't seem to help the PCI cards.
I've tried changing channels, toggling encryption, etc,
but nothing helped.
Does anyone know if replacing the antennas on the PCI cards
might help? Has anyone tried some? There are also active
antennas (http://www.lirr.net/BA24.htm for example), which
might work well, but they are a bit pricy (119 USD for this
model).
Or should I try to send the cards back and get a replacement?
Any help is greatly appreciated,
Christian Glodt
Hi all,
Our summer restaurant-meeting will take place on Thursday 26th 2004 at the
'Il Fragolino', if you want to join and haven't told us please do before
tomorrow noon.
We are 7 at the moment !
ciao,
pst
Hi
Using SuSE 9.1,
I have trouble using kmenuedit:
I add an entry (item), save all, and then start via the k-menu.
The entry appears correctly.
Then I try to edit it again via kmenuedit: The entry has disappeared.
I have always made an update via YOU of the kdelibs3, but that doesn't change
anything.
I googled around, but no real answer.
So I ask here: Where are these menuentries stored, how can I fix this problem
or how to go around?
Thanx
Al